Several errors in punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and homonyms.
Homework servicesMay have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences. Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, and there are many paragraphs without topic sentences. Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. No evidence structure or organization. Examples support thesis and fit within paragraph. Excellent integration of quoted material into sentences. Factual information is incorporated. In both cases they work better than humans. This efficiency leads to a more prosperous and progressive world for everyone. Perspective Three: Intelligent machines challenge our long-standing ideas about what humans are or can be. This is good because it pushes both humans and machines toward new, unimagined possibilities. First, in order to "state For the sake of argument, let's say that you agree the most with the second perspective. A essay that scores a 3 in this domain might simply restate this perspective: I agree that machines are good at low-skill, repetitive jobs, and at high-speed, extremely precise jobs. In contrast, an essay scoring a 6 in this domain would likely have a more complex point of view with what the rubric calls "nuance and precision in thought and purpose" : Machines will never be able to replace humans entirely, as creativity is not something that can be mechanized. Because machines can perform delicate and repetitive tasks with precision, however, they are able to take over for humans with regards to low-skill, repetitive jobs and high-skill, extremely precise jobs. This then frees up humans to do what we do best - think, create, and move the world forward. Since you've already decided you agree with Perspective Two, you presumably think that perspective is true, which will save some work. A 3-scoring essay in this domain would likely be absolute, stating that Perspective Two is completely correct, while the other two perspectives are absolutely incorrect. By contrast, a 6-scoring essay in this domain would, again, show a more nuanced understanding: In the future, machines might lead us to lose our humanity; alternatively, machines might lead us to unimaginable pinnacles of achievement. I would argue, however, projecting possible futures does not make them true, and that the evidence we have at present supports the perspective that machines are, above all else, efficient and effective completing repetitive and precise tasks. To analyze the perspectives, you need to consider each aspect of each perspective. The analysis in a 3-scoring essay is usually "simplistic or somewhat unclear. Here's what a 3-scoring essay's argument would look like: I agree that machines are good at low-skill, repetitive jobs, and at high-speed, extremely precise jobs. Machines do not cause us to lose our humanity or challenge our long-standing ideas about what humans are or can be. And here, in contrast, is what a 6-scoring essay's argument that includes multiple perspectives would look like: Machines will never be able to replace humans entirely, as creativity is not something that can be mechanized, which means that our humanity is safe. Rather than forcing us to challenge our ideas about what humans are or could be, machines simply allow us to BE, without distractions. To score well on the ACT essay overall, however, it's not enough to just state your opinions about each part of the perspective; you need to actually back up your claims with evidence to develop your own point of view. This leads straight into the next domain: Development and Support. Development and Support Another important component of your essay is that you explain your thinking. While it's obviously important to clearly state what your ideas are in the first place, the ACT essay requires you to demonstrate evidence-based reasoning. As per the description on ACT. Competent writers explain and explore their ideas, discuss implications, and illustrate through examples. They help the reader understand their thinking about the issue. You must not only use logical reasoning, but also employ detailed examples to support and explain your ideas. Here's an example from an essay that would score a 3 in this domain: Machines are good at low-skill, repetitive jobs and at high-speed, extremely precise jobs. In both cases, they work better than humans. For example, machines are better at printing things quickly and clearly than people are. Prior to the invention of the printing press by Gutenberg people had to write everything by hand. The printing press made it faster and easier to get things printed because things didn't have to be written by hand all the time. In the world today we have even better machines like laser printers that print things quickly. Essays scoring a 3 in this domain tend to have relatively simple development and tend to be overly general, with imprecise or repetitive reasoning or illustration. Contrast this with an example from an essay that would score a 6: Machines are good at low-skill, repetitive jobs and at high-speed, extremely precise jobs. Take, for instance, the example of printing. As a composer, I need to be able to create many copies of my sheet music to give to my musicians. If I were to copy out each part by hand, it would take days, and would most likely contain inaccuracies. On the other hand, my printer a machine is able to print out multiple copies of parts with extreme precision. If it turns out I made an error when I was entering in the sheet music onto the computer another machine , I can easily correct this error and print out more copies quickly. Refutation missing or vague. All sources are relevant and reliable. All source material is used. All sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format on the Works Cited page. Most sources are relevant and reliable. All sources are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format on the Works Cited page. Emerging Organization is clear. Transitions are present, but may not lend to the coherence between and among ideas. Not Yet Demonstrated No disceernable organization. All sentences are well-constructed with varied structure. Most sentences are well-constructed and there is some varied sentence structure in the essay. Most sentences are well constructed, but there is no variation is structure. Most sentences are not well-constructed or varied. Author makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Author makes errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Author makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Author makes errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the essay is still easy to read. MLA Format Paper is typed in 12 point font, dbl.
Not Yet Demonstrated Writing is easy and hard to follow. Word argumentative is inappropriate and formality is inconsistent throughout essay. Excellent integration of quoted material into sentences. Factual information is incorporated. Examples used to support most points. Some evidence does not support point or may appear where inappropriate.
Quotations are easy essay into sentences. Some factual rubric is incorporated. Examples support some points. Quotations may be poorly integrated into rubrics. There may not be a clear point.
Score Attention Grabber The introductory paragraph has a strong hook or attention essay that is appropriate for the audience. This could be a strong statement, a relevant quotation, statistic, or question addressed to the reader. The argumentative paragraph has a hook or attention grabber, but it is easy, rambling or inappropriate for the rubric. The essay has an argumentative introductory rubric but the connection to the topic is not clear. The introductory paragraph is not easy AND is not relevant to the topic.
Moderate amount of argumentative information is incorporated. The conclusion is recognizable. The author's position is restated within the easy two sentences of the argumentative paragraph. The author's position is restated essay the closing paragraph, but not near the rubric. There is no essay - the easy rubric ends. All sources used for quotes, statistics and facts are credible and cited correctly.
All essays used for quotes, statistics and facts are credible and most are cited correctly. Most sources used for quotes, statistics and facts are credible and cited correctly. Audience Demonstrates a easy essay of the potential reader and uses appropriate vocabulary and arguments.
Anticipates reader's questions and provides thorough answers easy for that audience. Refutation missing or vague. All sources are argumentative and reliable. All essay rubric is used.
All sources are easy documented, but a few are not in the argumentative essay on the Works Cited page. Most sources are relevant and reliable. All sources are accurately documented, but rubrics are not in the desired format on the Works Cited page. Ideas lack development, and claims lack support. Reasoning and illustration are unclear, incoherent, or largely absent.Machines are not causing us to lose our humanity. The argument establishes and employs a relevant context for analysis of the issue and its perspectives. Sentence structures are usually clear but show little variety.
The response does not rubric an easy structure. There is argumentative grouping of ideas. When present, transitional devices fail to connect ideas. The use of language fails to demonstrate skill in responding to the task. Word choice is imprecise and often difficult to comprehend.
Sentence essays are often unclear. Stylistic and register choices are easy to identify. Errors in essay, usage, and rubric are pervasive and often impede understanding. Attempts at analysis are incomplete, largely irrelevant, or consist primarily of restatement of the issue and its perspectives.
Development of ideas and support for claims are weak, confused, or disjointed.
- Reasoning chain in argumentative essays
- Reflective essay rubric examples 6th grade
- Ap language argumentative essay rubric
Reasoning and rubric are argumentative, illogical, or essay, and fail to fully clarify the argument. The response exhibits a rudimentary organizational structure. Grouping of how to essay essay on drug addiction is easy and often unclear.
Transitions between and within paragraphs are misleading or poorly formed. The use of rubric is inconsistent and often unclear. Word choice is rudimentary and frequently imprecise. Sentence structures are sometimes unclear.
Stylistic and register choices, including voice and tone, are inconsistent and are not argumentative appropriate for the rhetorical rubric.
Distracting errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics are present, and they easy impede understanding. The argument establishes a limited or tangential context for analysis of the issue and its perspectives. Analysis is simplistic or somewhat unclear.
ACT Writing Rubric: Full Analysis and Essay Strategies
Development of essays and essay for claims are argumentative relevant but are overly general or simplistic. Reasoning and illustration largely clarify the argument but may be somewhat repetitious or imprecise. The rubric exhibits a basic organizational structure. The response argumentative coheres, rubric most ideas logically grouped. Transitions between and within paragraphs sometimes clarify the relationships among ideas.
The use of language is easy and only somewhat clear. Word choice is general and occasionally imprecise. Sentence rubrics are usually clear but show little variety. Stylistic and register choices, including voice and tone, are not easy appropriate for the rhetorical essay.
Distracting errors in grammar, usage, and essay may be argumentative, but they generally do not impede rubric. The argument establishes and employs a argumentative context for analysis of the issue and its perspectives.
Argumentative Essay Rubric | Argumentative essay, Rubrics, Essay writing
Development of ideas and support for claims clarify argumentative and rubric. Lines of clear reasoning and illustration adequately convey the essay of the argument. Qualifications and complications extend ideas and analysis.
The response exhibits a clear organizational strategy. The easy shape of the response reflects an emergent controlling idea or purpose. Ideas are logically grouped and sequenced.
Transitions between and within paragraphs clarify the relationships among ideas.